Thoughts and issues regarding the past and present of a great football club by "The Chronicler".

Thursday 30 August 2012

We Wanted Change


The eminently fine Aston Villa Life blog - http://www.astonvillalife.com/aston-villa-blog/you-wanted-change-you-got-it/ - states "You wanted change - You got it!". It goes on to reflect how the club had paid over the odds for players and was paying wages it couldn't afford, and it had to come to the point that it was a route that was unsustainable. "We" wanted change, apparently, and we got it.

But hang on! "We" didn't ask for a change in that respect, did we? As far as I recall it was the owner who backtracked on finding he hadn't the wherewithall to back his commitment. The primary change "we" wanted was a manager who knew his stuff, thinking that an enterprising owner (now that he's re-couped cash from his other sporting venture) would back such a manager.

Now I don't argue with the need to keep spending under control, but the old business adage is that you only get back what you put into it. If you want success you have to take some kind of risk towards that success - if you're timid then you might just stand to fall. And - for goodness sake - this is Aston Villa, not Birmingham City or Coventry City.  The club's motto is "Prepared". I bet Randy wishes it wasn't!

The Aston Villa Life blog article goes on to admit that, "Oh, yes, we are spending on some lower league players for reinforcements" - but the reality is showing up to be the case that all the reinforcements are coming in from the lower leagues - or players from abroad without PL experience.

Now, I accept that players such as Vlaar and El-Ahmadi may well grow in stature as the season progresses. But I feel the key question is whether Ireland and Nzog can also raise their game to lead the way for the young players coming from the lower divisions.

Villa's season, to me, now rests on the ability of Ireland and Nzog (and Gabby?) to do the business. If not, then the club will have failed to address the key questions, which I see as (a) the mastery of the midfield and (b) the kind of supply that Bent expects. And that failure could mean another 16th/17th place at best or ... (the unmentionable).

And "..." will only prolong the agony as I see it.
.

No comments: