I was quite
optimistic before the season started; I felt that Villa would come out of their
tough first three games with three points, and they have. But the gremlins
decided to interject so that the three points were surprisingly (and happily)
obtained at The Emirates in the first match, against a rather disunited
Arsenal.
I had expected
that the points would be obtained in the third match – against Liverpool at home – but Villa disappointed a little in the
first half.
The overall
situation is more-or-less what I had hoped for at the start – that Villa have
confirmed that they have substantially improved since mid-way through last
season and, indeed, that the squad looks capable of producing at least a
middle-of-the-table finish to the season as the re-building continues. Their
form in the Arsenal match was encouraging, and in the match at Stamford Bridge only four days later, they were
unlucky to come away without any points.
These first three
matches have necessitated the gradual introduction of new ‘blood’, and they will
take a little time to develop understanding amongst themselves. But the squad
looks as though it will be capable of dealing with the tough programme of fixtures to the end of October and should then
be in a good position to develop well in the rest of the season and perhaps even
give us a good run in one or two cup competitions.
There is good
reason for hope.
My fear is that
the effective breakaway tactics used in away matches will not be appropriate in
home games. The tradition was once that Villa should be the top-dog on their own soil, and that meant visible domination of the
opposition. We’ve not really seen very much of that for quite a few seasons at
home, and certainly not much against the top teams.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment