A bit of wry news came my way this week. I learnt that Peter Lupson's and my
book 'The Inspirational William McGregor' is sold out at the Villa stores and is
being discontinued as a line in their catalogue. We are both surprised at this.
Very surprised.
Now, some may say "Well, so what?" But this point is not just about the
discontinuation of a book, it appears to be a reflection of the official
attitude towards the club's heritage and traditions.
After all, the story of William McGregor is one that I would have thought
we're all proud of - it's timeless. If the club was as proud of the club's
tradition as we are then surely the management would ensure that at least some
copies of this book would always be retained and visible in their
stores.
Their decision comes after purchasing and selling just 66 copies. This
compares to another 420 copies sold in the rest of the country - mainly in the
north of England and Scotland - and overseas. The south (of course!) were barely
interested. Even the Football League didn't want to promote it, but made sure
they got 5 free copies.
As we had around 500 printed, we were left with about 16 copies and I
offered these to the Villa stores at a discount. After all, William McGregor was
a Villan I thought. But the offer was refused.
Meanwhile David Woodhall's books always remain on the shelves of the Villa
stores. I have nothing against his books whatsoever, but in my opinion they do
not really reflect the majesty of the club's history. Maybe his books have more
of a commercial edge, regardless of the content.
And then we move onto the matter of the museum. It was part of the plans to
re-build the North Stand and the car park complex, but the whole project has
been mothballed - for now, we are told.
But I cannot for the life of me see why a temporary museum cannot be made
available until the main development comes into effect. Even Doug Ellis did
something in that direction. After all, 3 years have already lapsed since plans
were drawn up. This development would not only help to promote the greatness of
the club's history and its influence on the professional game, but would also
bring in extra cash to help the club's finances. I feel that such an investment
would help in changing the country's overall perspective of the club.
When I was at Villa Park (in 2009) I was asked to provide some financial
arguments to show the sustainability of a Villa Park museum. I did some research
into the museums of Manchester United, Chelsea and Arsenal (and one or two
others as I recall) and discovered that Man U sometimes achieved 300,000
visitors in one year - but more typically 200,000. Chelsea and Arsenal were of
the 100,000 annual visitors variety.
So, I put forward a conservative figure of around 50,000 annual visitors
for Villa and, at an entry fee comparable to Man U's, there would have been a
substantial financial return. And the Villa stores would have benefited in the
process. The idea seemed to have been accepted at the time but, surprise
surprise, I found myself sacked within 3 months and the idea of a museum was no
longer a priority.
I understand that the state of the world economy has changed very
significantly since 2009, but football somehow marches on and refreshing ideas
do need to be implemented to improve the club's image. The way the club is
promoted now is as though it is just another football club; I feel that the
aspirations of the Children of the Revolution have been removed.
It is said that 'old is gold', and I for one believe that is a good
description of Aston Villa.
The club's history may be in the past - but what a history! And what a
history to be made something of.
And, since we have a fan by the name of Tom Hanks, I would have thought he
could make a very good movie to help his favourite club along! I wonder who
would play the roles of George Ramsay and Archie Hunter?
.
No comments:
Post a Comment